Understanding a shifting problem with CVTs

By Ferman Lao

Hi, Ferman!

Good day to the TGP community.

Our City is six years old (she grows up so fast) and she's got a new problem. When shifting in reverse, there are times when it seems to slip out of "gear," stop momentarily then re-engages. The fluids have been replaced but that didn't seem to do the trick. I can only guess that the CVT belts or chains or whatever have worn out. I think the CVTs are better suited to more developed countries, hence Honda's move to bring out the more conventional automatic in the newer City and Jazz.

What's the problem and what's the possible solution?

Thanks!

Aloha Milkyway

Hi, Aloha Milkway!

To better understand your problem let's take a quick look at the CVT transmission found in the 2003-2009 City. It uses a metal belt running across two conical pairs of a variable diameter pulley. When either of the conical pair of the variable pulley changes diameter, the opposite variable pulley changes in size as well. It changes at exactly the same rate in relation to each in order to keep the metal chain link belt taut at all times. By varying the diameter of each of the pulley the transmission effectively changes gear ratios from a 1:1 ratio to less than 1:1 in favor of the drive side or more than 1:1.

A large input to the throttle pedal will usually cause a downshift (engine rpm goes up along with vehicle speed) of the transmission, while a releasing the pedal slightly followed by any input large or small will result in an upshift (engine rpm goes down with increasing vehicle speed). Keeping the pedal steady will also result in a steady increase in vehicle speed without a change in engine rpm, in this instance the transmission is also upshifting.

I've found that under most conditions the latter two methods of throttle application is all you need. Fuel economy also is better using the two methods. Keeping the shift lever in "D" instead of using the shift buttons also result in a lower engine rpm for a given vehicle speed. However, that's just how it shifts. Power has to be transferred somehow from the engine to the transmission and on conventional fixed-ratio-per-gear transmissions the job is done by a torque converter.

Some car manufacturers also choose to use a torque converter for their CVTs. In fact Honda has chosen to go this route as well for their 2010 CVT-equipped model Jazz units, unlike the first generation Jazz that used a clutch much like the one you find in manual-transmission-equipped cars. Using a clutch has the advantage of less power loss and better efficiency vis a vis a torque converter. Over time the clutch wears down and slippage occurs, resulting in poor or inconsistent power transfer--this is probably what your encountering now. This wear is accelerated when the transmission is subjected to repeated torque or power inputs wherein more than the required amount to move the car forward is applied, as the transmission will let the clutch "slip" when the situation happens.

Once the clutch starts slipping often like yours does, the end of the line will be the car won't be able to move forward anymore when the clutch finally wears out. Replacement of the transmission is the only recourse--a rather expensive one as a new one will cost in the ballpark of P300,000. The cheaper alternative is getting a surplus unit for about P20,000. Be aware though that a surplus unit will be a gamble. Generally they will have quite a bit of usable life in them, but as always you run the risk of getting one that’s as bad as what you already have as well.

You can try this experiment. On an incline try giving a large input (half or more of full pedal travel) to the throttle, see how much time it takes for your car to move up. After that, try applying a smaller throttle input (a quarter or less of total). You may be surprised to find out that there is very little difference in the time in takes to move forward.

Regards,

Ferman Lao
Technical editor

COMMENTS

User account login

Not registered? Click here to be a TopGear.com.ph member.

Forgot your Password?.

Click this link to view our posting guidelines.

Filter comments by:
  • GBfive Sep 12 2011 @ 07:39pm
    i agree. CVTs are for developed countries with better road conditions and shorter lifespan for cars.
  • Aloha Milkyway Sep 12 2011 @ 08:20pm
    Wow, I wasn't expecting a reply at all. Thanks Ferman! Oh and one more thing :
    "Replacement of the transmission is the only recourse--a rather expensive one as a new one will cost in the ballpark of P300,000."
    JEEZAS!!!!
  • Pininfarina Sep 13 2011 @ 01:06am
    @Aloha what's the mileage?
  • vonschnipp Sep 13 2011 @ 08:46am
    Never understood why anyone would want a car with CVT, basically a transmission held together by an expensive pair of suspenders. Give me a manual anytime.
  • fortis Sep 13 2011 @ 09:20am
    That is why I prefer good old M/Ts. Cheaper to maintain and offers lots of fun!
  • Aloha Milkyway Sep 13 2011 @ 12:47pm
    @ Pininfarina
    My mother's City has done 85,000 kms now
    @ vonschnipp
    Ask my mother why she wanted that car so bad hahahaha
    @ fortis
    Agreed. I'm still thankful for the EU market for not giving up on manuals. Luxury barges like the S-Class or the 7-series aside, EVERYTHING is a available in manual. As for the ASEAN market...SAVE THE MANUALS
  • anson Sep 14 2011 @ 03:04pm
    Sir Ferman Lao , after reading this article , i like to know about the POWERSHIFT of the FORD FIESTA will it be this expensive ?
    if the clutch wear outs , can it be replace like the normal clucth disc , pressure plates , plywheel & up to the tranmission assembly ?

    thanks
  • Falcon Sep 15 2011 @ 08:54am
    Is P300,000 a typo? At that price I'd take my chances with 15 surplus units. I'd probably get a good one out of fifteen.
  • Ferman Lao
    Ferman Lao Oct 10 2011 @ 09:14pm
    @Anson,
    As far as I know the powershift transmission of the Fiesta isn't a dealer serviceable unit. If you manage to wear it out, you'll most likely need to replace it with a whole unit. It's not likely that you can easily wear it out though as built in safeties include the transmission disengaging from the engine if you keep on the brake for more than several seconds with the gear selector in either D or L.
  • stickshifter 3 months ago
    Thanks for this very useful and informative column. Unfortunately, my first automatic was a cvt. had to trade it in and went back to manual. But given this risk of breaking down, how come more and more cars nowadays are using cvt? Even some small SUVs are now fitted with cvt. How are they different from the City's cvt? Are they more durable and less costly to maintain?
Filter comments by:
1 to 10 of 10