10.
On looks and practicality: Hyundai Tucson vs Toyota Innova (56 comments)
From Wrong Car, Right Car Online
Raymund: We are planning on purchasing a new vehicle some time towards the third quarter of this year. Our top choices are the new Hyundai Tucson and the Toyota Innova.
Botchi: Now that we're done with the basics, I agree that the Innova is hard to beat in your case (click this link to see the Toyota Innova lineup in the Philippines). I also love the Innova as it is surprisingly smooth and competent considering it's something of a humble multipurpose vehicle built on a truck chassis. The 2.5 D4-D diesel engine is powerful and punchy and is quite economical. Driving from Santander to Cebu City via the coastal highway at fast cruising speeds impressed me, netting just over ten kilometers per liter with three people inside plus a full load of cargo.
From our readersjclogan: If you wanna be like almost everyone else, then buy a Toyota..:) If you wanna be a little different, but something else, like the Tucson which kicks ass even the Fortuner.
hopeless: The Toyota Innova is the more appropriate choice for the letter sender. And do fill-up at petroleum stations with clean products.
barry allen: @raymund and gracielou: Guys, the best thing you can do is go to the dealerships and have a test-drive on the units that you mentioned. it's because,
kayo ang bibili ng sasakyan. iba iba kasi ang taste ng individual when it comes to cars. If possible, during the test-drive, accompany a relative or a friend so that in the event of the decision-making, they can give their opinions. And, if you want to resale the car after 5 years, keep your car stay in shape. It means, avoid accidents, check the engine regularly and follow the periodic maintenance schedule. That is the only way you can take care of your car. Thanks.
Read more 9.
Van wars: Toyota Hiace vs Nissan Urvan (56 comments)
From Wrong Car, Right Car Online
Myron: I just got married in March and my wife (who is now pregnant) and I are currently looking for our first car. We want a car that has very "reliable reliability" because we may decide to use it for business (like for public transportation) in the future.
Botchi: For a family vehicle, the Toyota Hiace will feel more luxurious than the Nissan Urvan, but the Urvan will cost far less to maintain in the future so you get your money's worth with both vehicles.
From our readers
HDy: Our family was hunting for a van a few months ago. I and my brothers wanted the Hi-Ace Grandia GL. Our arguments: newer/more powerful engine; more japorms/contemporary looks; greater exclusivity; and higher resale value. My folks wanted the Nissan Urvan Escapade. Their arguments: their driver doesn't drive more than 80kph; they don't care how the car looks; they prefer the Urvan seats/spacing; it's extremely tried and tested (many Urvans are currently employed as long distance provincial shuttles); and more importantly--it’s about P400k cheaper. They won. We now have a spanking new white Urvan Escapade which, btw, took 2.5 months to get delivered from date of order due to unexpected high demand for it. As for it being sluggish…I suspect there are really no sluggish cars; just plenty of sluggish drivers. Botchi is correct--it takes a while for the Urvan to accelerate--but once it reaches 100kph - it is quite easy to cruise at that speed in top gear.
dumbo3:16: @Myron: I personally recommend the Urvan! Here at my office, we have the Hilux as our shuttle service and to be honest with you (no offense to the Toyota guys) the interiors are not that good! I don't know about the high-end version of it but ours is just to damn bad! Bad in the sense that my legs don't fit through the leg room of the seats (by the way, I'm only 5'7"). It is too "masikip" for a van. But the "masikip" part of the Hilux is well compensated by the muscle of the engine. It is fast (because of the CRDi engine). Going back to the comfort, the Nissan Urvan's seats are great! Not only that it's spacious, but your legs can fit through the leg room. I had the chance to ride one when we went to Pangasinan and travelling on it is great. Just as Botchi said, it's engine is not CRDi but runs just as fast as other CRDi engines. Afterall, you need a family car, right? All in all, I'm for the Urvan. Spacious, comfortable and really sums up to be a great family van.
Natatatwa: Tatawa ako sa mga pro-Urvan.
parang pinapalabas niyo na super van
yung dala niyo eh. Katulad din naman ng ibang auto
yan na kailangan i-change oil, proper maintenance
at nasisira din…kaya lang naman madami Urvan
kasi mas mora siya ng halos kalahating milyon compara mo sa HiAce. So
kung pang negosyo mo lang eh dun kana sa mura para tipid, money saved money earned.
Read more 8.
Pickup comparo: Nissan Navara, Ford Ranger and Mitsubishi Strada (61 comments)
From Wrong Car, Right Car OnlineDr. Glenn: I'm from Mindanao (Pagadian City, Zamboanga del Sur) and in the market for a new 4x4 pickup truck. I'm actually having this dilemma over which pickup to get. I'm a family man and THE pickup would be carrying my precious "cargo" around. We love to travel in the countryside and most of our roads are, to be honest, bad. I need a strong, safe, reliable ride that can tackle not only our highways but the rough roads also.
Botchi: The Mitsubishi Strada's engine is a highly fuel-efficient 3.2 CRDi that delivers good mid-range power--where you'll be spending most of your time driving instead of the top-end. Small touches like the rear-window that goes down to let fresh air come in more, a fancy audio system with iPOD/MP3 integration, dual airbags and an LSD make this the winner of the bunch. That it's the top-selling pickup in the market tells you something.
From our readers
maranello_5775: Strada will comfortably handle your family transporting needs while the ranger will make cinch of the offroading, the Navara on the other hand is a good choice because of its power but hampered by the low ground clearance(for a 4x4 truck)so offroading is not a strength. The balance pickup that will cater your needs and satisfy you with its good performance would be the Strada.
Joseph: Since your buying it for your family, go for the Hilux. It has the most comfortable seats and has more space inside compared to the others. It's not the most powerful pickup but it isn't the weakest either. Plus, you get the bulletproof reliability of Toyota.
howard: Nissan Navara or Ford Ranger or Mitsubishi Strada? i would choose Ford Ranger. A truck that is true to its purpose. Ample cargo space, Higher ground clearance, and powerful engine. Things that would disappoint you for Ford Ranger though are its back seat legroom space, bumpy suspension (if without cargo). But the things that would entice you to pick Ford Ranger from others are available after-services, you could get zero participation for any repair needed for your unit. You bump a tree and damage your bumper, you could send your unit to Ford casa for repair without paying a single penny. Not all Ford dealers offer zero-participation, you could check autohubgroup.com to see participating dealers. Seems my comments are biased but I happen to own a Ford Everest since 2008, and have used it nearly 90,000 kms for my Zamboanga-Davao trips.
Read more 7.
Pickup pointers (75 comments)
From Wrong Car, Right Car Online
Zeus: My dad and I are planning to buy a pickup truck next year and we're hoping to get a new model. My father gave me the blessing to choose what we will buy and I don't want to turn him down. I've been busy choosing and searching for the best pickup available in the market. We live in Tagum City, Davao del Norte and we love to travel. We occasionally drive from our place to my lola's home in Tiaong, Quezon.
Botchi: Personally, I'd pick the Toyota Hilux or the Mitsubishi Strada among the bunch because they deliver good power and decent fuel efficiency. They both have loads of room and refinement inside, and they have decent good looks (I love the Storm Trooper looks of the Strada). Both are decently fast and enjoyable fun daily drivers.
From our readers
dtkiko: When choosing a pick-up, the key elements usually come down to dependability, durability, safety, responsive power (provided in metered-fashion--right amount of power vis-a-vis torque where and when you need it, not brutish raw power like the other competitors), responsive torque (a torque supplied from 1400 rpm to 3400 rpm, it being the widest in the class, giving you the region in the powerband where the engine works most efficient in relation to power and fuel-efficiency) downright simplicity in looks (a pick-up without any frills), fuel efficiency, and best bang for your money (the cheapest 3-litre pick up in the market)--no doubt the 3-liter Isuzu D-Max 4JJ1-TC DDi-iTEQ fits all the bill. To reiterate things, I'm no stranger to pickups in my more than 14 years working in the minerals industry locally and overseas. And mining and exploration roads are not your ideal roads where we get to use these trucks. That egg-shape Strada Triton is even worse than the Toyota Hilux we're using here in Malaysia when it comes to interior space. The Navara as well as the D-Max are spacier than the two pick-ups mentioned, and definitely all of them will be out-performed by the D-Max in difficult-technical terrains in terms of handling, torque (which is delivered in metered-fashion and responsively even at low rpms), and traction (power being translated effectively onto the ground) needed in underground and open-cut mines.
sagaraemiru: If only the Nissan Navara had a higher ground clearance, it would have been at par with (or might even surpass) the other pickups mentioned. I have tested it, and I like everything on it, except for the aforementioned ground clearance.
Juan Miguel Mendoza: @zeus choose the Strada. It's high, fast, comfortable, and affordable. The recall of the suspension of Triton in australia doesn't affect Strada in the Philippines. The variant of the Triton that has the biggest number recalled was the Triton GLX-R(sporty and automatic tranny of GLX, not available in the Philippines). So don't worry. But the D4-D problem of Toyota is what I'm concerned. I don't know if it's finished already or not yet. But still, my opinion goes with the Strada. Strada is my bet.
Read more 6.
For hauling and long-distance driving: Isuzu D-Max or Mitsubishi Strada? (77 comments)
From Wrong Car, Right Car Online
JR: We're planning to buy a pickup truck soon for business and family use. But with the barrage of brands and juicy specs, it's hard to tell which one offers the best value for money in terms of reliability, economy, durability and maintenance cost. Since I asked around for friendly advice and additional information we decided to choose between Isuzu D-Max and Mitsubishi Strada 4x2. Hauling and constant traveling from Tarlac to Manila are our main purposes of buying.
Botchi: My top pick would be the Strada because, spec'd right, it would have the best value for money proposition out there. Hilux would be second but it is pricey.
From our readers
JBM 67:
Pare go for the Ford Ranger. It has leaf spring, which is designed for hauling. The engine is very powerful especially when you overtake. 2.5 5 speed A/T or M/T? It depends on your preference. The audio very nice and the aura is so MACHO. It can go 15 km to a liter of diesel (hi-way). Now, go and test drive one now. =)
arville: Yep, I agree with the people here with a heart for Ford--Go for Ranger, and D-max for 2nd option--if you’re looking for hauling power and reliability. These vehicles are made for hauling, especially Ford. And everybody knows Isuzu's forte is trucks and big vehicles…Not crappy thin-can bodied cars, pretending to be a 4x4.
mic: Ranger is the best. Hands down. Can give all the others a run for their money in terms of speed and toughness. My 08 ranger runs constant errands from Iloilo to Northern Panay (Caticlan or Buruanga). No complains, no nothing. Can run 160 bucks all the time. If you don't want to get smoked, go for the Ranger. The father in law has a Strada 3.2, driven it too, comfy but still I always feel there is not enough ommph to screw my ranger. Not even close.
Read more 5.
SUV options for a lady (87 comments)
From Wrong Car, Right Car Online
Malou: I'm trying to decide which SUV to buy. I've only browsed models via the Internet and I haven't checked one up close. It's so hard to decide. Do you think you can help me narrow down my search? I need something a smooth ride that is comfortable and roomy. It also has to have the power to overtake other cars.
Botchi: The Mitsubishi Pajero is the very best sport-utility vehicle in this segment with decent off-roading capability, a luxuriously smooth ride, a flexible and roomy interior with 7-seater capacity and a unique fold-flat-to-the-floor rear third row bench. I love the power and handling of the Pajero the most and feels very stable even at 190kph on the highway. The gasoline engine delivers almost V8-like torque and response but with better fuel consumption. It is the diesel engine, however, that is the best. I'd buy this baby in a heartbeat if I had the moolah.
From our readers
JBL: My family owns both the latest Pajero and Land Cruiser. Aside from the fact that the Land Cruiser has a modern design, I like it's 4WD system than the Pajero. And driving it feels very comfortable and strong. Still two thumbs up for the Pajero for it's heritage and performance. I'll recommend the Land Cruiser for Ms. Malou.
aNthraxx: My vote goes to the Pajero…looks better than the Prado. Although no complaints here either if she gets the Prado. Both are good vehicles.
gerbo: Prado is more desirable for me but the Pajero is no slack either.
Read more 4.
Round 2: Mitsubishi Montero Sport vs Toyota Fortuner (88 comments)
From Wrong Car, Right Car Online
Terry: I intend to buy an diesel-powered sport-utility vehicle with automatic transmission this year. My budget is at P1.5 million or lower. I'll be using it mainly for city driving so a 4x2 should be okay.
Botchi: The Mitsubishi Montero Sport is okay, but the more I use it (through test drives and the like) the more I feel that the Toyota Fortuner has far better refinements than the Montero Sport.
From our readers
barry allen: Suggestion
ko,
mag Montero or
mag Everest
ka na lang. The problem with the Fortuner is that, well, it's very big pero when you get inside, it feels cumbersome. the Montero feels tight in the third row. The Everest is a highly responsive car. The third seat is not a problem.
Mas ok
pa ang exterior because it's very muscular in shape.
Mas easy-to-reach
pa ang price. Suited pa sa budget
mo if
yung budget
mo is P1.5M. the LIMITED a/t priced at P1,410,000.
May change
ka pa. But if your choice is montero, then go for it...
cristan: I wonder why botchi didn't like the style of Kia Sorento. I would contest if someone says it's not appealing. Well, beauty is in the eye of the beholder though. I like the Monty than Fort. My father and I were toyota fans but that changed 3 years ago. My new family has the new Kia Sorento. Beauty is deceiving but not with Kia Sorento! It has power and looks plus quality and comfort. @ botchi yeah your right there are few Kia Sorento because its too pricey. We bought it for P1.790 and so far very satisfied!
dingdong pascual: Fortuner vs Montero is like Ateneo vs La Salle. It really depends on YOU not on the comments of others because they have there own side.
Read more 3.
Hot sedan options for a single dude (95 comments)
From Wrong Car, Right Car Online
Alain: I've never had a new car before. I always get it second hand. I currently have two cars--a 2003 Honda CR-V 4x2 and a 2005 Mazda 3 1.6 S. I'm planning to sell or swap the Mazda 3 for a top-of-the-line sedan. I'm eyeing brands like Mitsubishi, Honda, Toyota, and Mazda. Of these cars, which do you think suits me?
Botchi: The Mitsubishi Lancer EX GT-A fits your criteria to a T! I've driven it for a short period of time and was pretty much going fast most of the way, with the engine being new and tight. I got about 7.5 to eight kilometers a liter. Dynamically, this is the best and I love the bodykit, the big 18-inch wheels and Rockford Fosgate sound system. The INVECS III CVT transmission, when left in automatic mode, ensures that power and acceleration are always plenty, thanks to seamless shifting; it will play a pivotal role in fuel economy.
From our readers
rdjl_13: Looks, performance and fuel efficiency goes to Lancer EX. Fuel efficiency because it has more gears than the mentioned sedans. Everyone knows that when it comes to looks and performance the Lancer EX wins. :) Maintenance goes to the Altis because it's a "Toyota".
wart_les: Basing on the criteria ALAIN has given, though unsolicited, I would advise him to take on the New HONDA CIVIC with the 1.8 liter engine it has good fuel economy. And the budget difference taking a 2.0 liter car would probably be better spent on modulo kit to improve the looks of the CIVIC plus providing backing sensors, etc.
Kristian Peralta: I agree with Botchi. For single dudes who have the propensity to show off a little, the Lancer is the way to go. The Impreza is actually a better choice but it's in a different price bracket, if you can afford it then don't hesitate. If you want to be bit subtle though then I recommend the Civic, you can't go wrong with that. If you really want to project a macho image, don't get the ATs. MTs is still the drivers' car.
Read more 2.
Top off-road picks (102 comments)
From Wrong Car, Right Car Online
Dominic: My consultant from Cardinal Santos Medical Center is asking if you could help her find an off-road vehicle (I assume a four-wheel drive sport-utility vehicle) with good resale value and safety features.)
Botchi: This is the most refined SUV in the market today. It also offers great value for money. That it is a favorite camera car when we do chase shoots on still photos is a testament to its smoothness, thanks to supple suspension and a hybrid car- and truck-based platform. Resale wise, it's quite hard to tell because I don't see a lot of people selling their Santa Fes--which must be a good thing.
From our readers
navigator2377: Yet another choosing game! I would still of course go for the Montero Sport. It's really not less legroom in the middle row because it is adjustable forward and backwards both seats. Therefore, you will have more legroom at the third row seats as well..I don't feel any harsh ride condition regarding suspension, well in fact very smooth ride specially in rocky roads.. Test drive is still the best.. Happy choosing! Feel the macho appeal of the Montero Sport inside and outside.
Banana: Santa Fe. The best engine in the class. Yung Monty
takaw yan sa oil. Best of all global
talaga ang Santa Fe
at pasado sa safety standards ng US and Western Europe,
yung iba dyan pang 3rd world countries lang katulad ng Pilipinas at Thailand.
Mga pickup
na nilagyan lang ng bubong kaya mura kasi wala ng innovation
dahil nandyan na yung pick up truck
gawan na lang ng paraan para salpakan ng bubong ayos na meron na tayong SUV!
Rem:
Kung ako papapiliin Montero Sport
ako kasi may variant sila na 2.5 Liter 4x4 manual
na mas mura kesa sa ibang SUVs
lalo na sa safety features.
Yung Santa Fe
naman natalo pa ng Kia Sorento (1st gen)
sa off road test
kasi hindi nga naman siya designed
na maging hardcore off roader.
Read more 1.
Sedan options: Honda City vs Toyota Vios (103 comments)
From Wrong Car, Right Car Online
Bill: I'd like you to help me choose a brand new sedan for our family. Our budget is P600,000 to P700,000. This will be the first time for us to have a gas-powered car. We are currently choosing between a Honda City 1.3 A or S, and Toyota Vios 1.3 E. We want a fuel-efficient car that is comfortable and easy to maintain and drive. It has to have safety features and present more value for money.
Botchi: The Toyota Vios, though a bit generic and safe, is the better choice because of the engine's power delivery characteristics, the affordable after-sales servicing (compared to Honda in general) and the wide dealership network. Toyota makes owning a Vios far more easier and hassle-free. And since there's decent power and torque from the Vios' engine, you only have to prod the throttle lightly and rev the engine so much to get decent forward motion. It makes for a miserly fuel consumption.
From our readers
Lee17: I agree, when the City was released I instantly fell in love with its looks…then eventually my interest faded after trying it out. I didn't like the Vios either, but after checking the 1.3E and considering the price compared to the City, its a no-brainer. Let’s face it, the 40k difference means a lot of gas for months on end.
Michikoy: If you want a higher resale value later in the future choose the City. Likewise if you're looking for better looks and a little meaty performance on straights. If you just plainly want a car that goes from point A and B you may opt for Vios but the looks… well it looks a like a common generic taxi that you'll see in short time loosing its face value.
alden balili: Performance, city is better. Price, Vios is way much cheaper.
Pero mas mura yung Mitsubishi Lancer GLX/GLS CS3 model (not the recently launched model). For the old model, but brand new, lancer you get bigger car, bigger interior space, bigger engine, more comfy ride (4 wheel independent suspension instead of the Vios' and City's rear solid axle). Although
malakas sa gas
yung lancer
kasi 1.6 and doesn't have the Mivec technology,
pero ok na rin.
Read more
