Solon seeks to ban aftermarket HID, xenon headlights

TopGear.com.ph Philippine Car News - Solon seeks to ban aftermarket HID, Xenon headlights

Motorists who have retrofitted their vehicle with aftermarket high-intensity discharge (HID) headlamps or xenon bulbs may find themselves in trouble if House Bill 3769 filed by Rep. Neri Javier Colmenares of the Bayan Muna party-list is passed into law.

Known as the Act Prohibiting the Use of High Intensity Discharge (HID) Headlamps, the bill filed by Colmenares claims that the excessive glare generated by HID or xenon headlamps inconveniences drivers and passengers of other vehicles.

"Many countries have prohibited or regulated the use of these headlamps precisely in response to the threat to road safety posed by its use," Colmenares said.

According to Colmenares, the bill seeks to address the problem posed by the use of non-standard headlights, "particularly bright and glaring white lights by vehicles that use HID or high intensity discharge headlamps."

"The use of these HID headlamps in vehicles, including refitting of tungsten-halogen headlamps to HID headlamps, is not in consonance with traffic safety standards," said Colmenares.

The solon added that the distraction caused by the glare may result in serious accidents that not only endangers other vehicles and motorists but pedestrians as well.

Under the bill, any person or entity selling motor vehicles equipped with glaring lamps shall be fined P100,000 for every sale of a vehicle fitted with the headlamp. Registered car owners and drivers of a motor vehicle installed with or using the prohibited HID headlamp shall each be fined with P10,000.

Since retrofitting HID headlamps is illegal in major car manufacturing markets like the United States and Germany, do you think it should also be declared as illegal in a small market like the Philippines?

COMMENTS

User account login

Not registered? Click here to be a TopGear.com.ph member.

Forgot your Password?.

Click this link to view our posting guidelines.

Filter comments by:
  • bot May 17 2011 @ 03:36pm
    sama nyo na din yung mga taillights na hindi red light.. madalas ko to napapansin sa mga motor, yung tailights nila puti..
  • Rem May 17 2011 @ 04:03pm
    Improve street lights kung ipapatanggal niyo ang HID. :D
    • Jerricson May 17 2011 @ 07:39pm
      Tama :)
      • Rem May 17 2011 @ 08:10pm
        na convince ko kasi si papa magpakabit since pati ako nadidiliman na. :D pero hindi naman lahat ng HID e nakakasakit sa mata, mas matindi pa ang mga puti ang color. :D sayang din naman kasi ang pera ng mga nagpakabit.
    • envyme May 17 2011 @ 09:15pm
      Yiz =))
    • Rem May 17 2011 @ 11:00pm
      and btw, hindi naman po laging "porma" ang reason kung bakit nagpapalagay ng HID ang mga car owners. :) nagulat nga ako nung nabalita ang SCTEX dahil sa aksidente na sumalpok ang Outlander sa truck. madilim po talaga kasi, tapos sabi pa nila "well lit" naman daw. oo well lit pag malapit na sa mga toll, pero pag dating sa gitna, wala na. :(
    • Kyoichi Sudo May 18 2011 @ 05:25pm
      tama! kung di naman maliwanag ang street lights, wag na ituloy. at saka ang arte naman nang Rep Neri Javier, inggit lng yan cguro, baka d nya afford ang HID headlamps hehehehehe!!!!
      • Kyoichi Sudo May 18 2011 @ 05:26pm
        by the way, magpalagay muna sya ng streetlights sa daang hari sa cavite bago ipasa yang act na yan
  • HKB May 17 2011 @ 04:06pm
    e solve nyo muna ang nga kotong cops bago yan, lalo na sa provincia ang dami ng mga LTO kotong checkpoints!!!!!!!!
  • migster2 May 17 2011 @ 04:10pm
    better if they just ban the refitting of HID bulbs on cars that don't have projector-type headlight housings
  • dragun May 17 2011 @ 04:25pm
    Yey! ..pero sana yung aftermarket lang, matino naman yung projectors ng Audi and BMW
    • 997 GT2RS May 17 2011 @ 04:35pm
      He is referring to aftermarket HID's not factory fitted ones..
  • javeesoto May 17 2011 @ 04:34pm
    pinapatupad na ba ngaun to?..

    @migster2: agree ako dun.mas glaring kasi ung hindi projector headlight e..
  • fdelmonte May 17 2011 @ 04:34pm
    may tutunguhan kaya ang pag file niya ng bill? baka hangganag unang salvo lang.

    Maraming kotse dyan, na casa pa nagkakabit ng HID, pero talagang di tutulad sa original. Iba naman kasi talaga ang Headlamps ng for HID at for halogen.

    Siguro isama niyo na rin ang mga kotse na sobrang liwanag ng 3rd brake light, parang laser.
  • fdelmonte May 17 2011 @ 04:35pm
    aftermarket lang talaga dapat ang iban ng bill na ito, no harm on motorist ang original HID.

    Some vehicles here, planta pa nagkakabit ng aftermarket HID.
  • jmpet626 May 17 2011 @ 04:58pm
    Basta naka OEM projector naman yung HID walang glare yan. Pano yung toyota vios na limited edition naka HID siya pag binili mo pero hindi naka projector
  • rdjl_13 May 17 2011 @ 05:36pm
    paano kaya nila malalaman kung aftermarket o original HID? :D
  • javeesoto May 17 2011 @ 05:38pm
    o kaya i-ban nila ung mga HID na sobrang taas ng kelvin.un ang masasakit sa mata e..i-allow nila kahit hanggang 8k kelvin lang.hehe
  • shogitai May 17 2011 @ 05:55pm
    i my opinion they should limit the kelvin for non-projectors up to 4300K.
  • HAHAman May 17 2011 @ 06:07pm
    Ayusin muna yung street lighting. Kaya nagiinstall yung mga car owners for their and the pedestrians safety, Try nyo magdrive magisa sa Tondo slum area na ang headlight mo malabong halogen! kakabahan ka to the max!
  • javeesoto May 17 2011 @ 06:12pm
    tama!..that's why i install HID on my headlights and fog lights e.kasi nga there are some places na super dilim talaga na kahit bright e kulang
    • mico23 May 17 2011 @ 07:24pm
      and to the disadvantage of oncoming motorists?
      • javeesoto May 17 2011 @ 08:31pm
        nasa gumagamit na un kung panu nya imamanage ung pag gamit ng HID nya. i only usually use my headlights na projector type with 4300 kelvin. bihira ko gamitin fogs ko with 8000 kelvin. and i even adjusted lower ung focus ng headlights ko. if im not mistaken pinagbawal ata before sa makati HID with 10000 kelvin. everything has its purpose..hindi sa disagree ako sa pag-ban ng HID..may sarili ako reason bakit ako nagpalagay nun. respect everyone's opinion
  • legacy May 17 2011 @ 06:25pm
    dapat ipagbawal din ang sobrang dark tint.

    problema kasi magpapalagay ng dark tint tapos mag-papaHID kasi hirap makakita sa gabi. eh kung hindi kasi kayo nagpatint ng sobrang dilim edi hindi niyo kailangan mag HID in the first place. common sense lang.

    but then again common sense isnt very common.
  • mico23 May 17 2011 @ 07:20pm
    Our eyes take considerable time to adapt to the glare produced by non-projector HID lamps. It's like placing a bright flashlight in front of your eyes. I protest to such nuisance with a long horn blow. For the safety of everyone else using the road at night, PASS IT!
  • RS500 May 17 2011 @ 07:54pm
    @Jerricson

    Pumikit? Aun na...may aksidente na kasi pumikit ung driver. lagot na...gets?
  • hydrashok May 17 2011 @ 08:09pm
    @Jerricson

    Kaya nga dapat ipagbawal ang aftermarket na HID dahil sa mga driver na tulad mo.
  • Feeter Silverster May 17 2011 @ 08:17pm
    tama ka legacy, ako kuntento sa halogen lamp kasi medium tint lang gamit ko...tama i-BAN na yang HID...
  • Feeter Silverster May 17 2011 @ 08:20pm
    @ jerricson, pumikit sila? booooo! be considerate, di komo kaya mong ipagyabang ang HID mo eh wala ka ng pakialam sa madlang people...di mo naman masasabing safe ang kalsada tapos dadagdag pang hazard iyang HID, hay naku!
  • dragun May 17 2011 @ 08:47pm
    @legacy

    ...at natumbok mo yung problema! nag-da-dark tint tapos mag-HID dahil di na makita yung daan
  • dragun May 17 2011 @ 08:51pm
    @Jerricson
    ...sure, sabihin ko yun sa driver ng 10 wheeler dump truck namin
    Last modified May 17 2011 @ 08:55pm
  • envyme May 17 2011 @ 09:14pm
    improve muna nila yung street lights at yung mga madidilim na lugar sa province lagyan nila bago nila patanggal ang hid!!!!!
  • fdelmonte May 17 2011 @ 09:39pm
    take some time to read this : http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roadsafety/drs/hidheadlampthe problem on the headlamp is not whether it projector or just the regular ones, the problem rises from the beam, both HID and halogen headlamps have different beam patterns. Last time, I saw the Vios limited , it seems fitted with aftermarket HID (it's factory installed, so you get nice brackets), unlike those of high end cars which are original (let's just say they're designed to be HID, so beam is perfect). Based on my observation, originals have their ballast underneath the headlamp itself, whereas the aftermarket are just bracketed somewhere in engine bay.
    Last modified May 17 2011 @ 09:44pm
  • fdelmonte May 17 2011 @ 09:51pm
    first things first, HID ang problema bakit tint nadamay na rin ? Let's face it, mali mali talaga ang knowledge natin when it comes to these technologies. Kasi puro remedyo ang ginagawa, which ends up to poor local standards. Sino naman nagsabi na dapat projector type lang ang puwede mag HID? Ang problema yung beam pattern. Ipagtabi niyo dapat ang isang car na same model, isa fitted with Original HID at isa aftermarket to see ang difference. Para malaman na ang original HID hindi eye straining kahit katapat mo pa ang source ng light.
  • ericruz May 17 2011 @ 10:05pm
    no to HID,
  • nic_homeaid May 17 2011 @ 10:07pm
    I don't think it'll be passed
    Last modified May 18 2011 @ 01:10pm
  • maklo02 May 17 2011 @ 10:11pm
    FINALLY! matagal tagal ko na gusto magkaron ng law na ganito. IPASA NIYO YAN:) And the tail lights that aren't even red.
  • maklo02 May 17 2011 @ 10:18pm
    Aminin niyo na kasi, yung mga nagpapalagay ng HID na nakakadugo ng mata ng ibang drivers, ginagawa yun mainly for porma. Sige wala pa ngang namamatay dahil dun, pero aantayin mo pa ba magkaron?
  • fdelmonte May 17 2011 @ 10:32pm
    hindi ata tinuro ng foreign entity na incharge sa safety yung HID , kaya di alam ng mahihinang LGU natin.. HAHHAHAH.
    Last modified May 17 2011 @ 10:32pm
  • warak1422 May 17 2011 @ 11:36pm
    multicab ko nga nka HID hehe
  • GTi May 18 2011 @ 12:35am
    Hell no! For visibility purposes, the HID headlight stays.
  • zetsumei May 18 2011 @ 12:35am
    Can they first focus on more dangerous things like JEEPNEYS or Taxis without any HEADLIGHTS? WTF? thats dangerous shit! you can barely see them coming with the limited lights on the road. Y are they not Apprehending them? Bawal din yan sa batas pero daming Jeeps at Taxis ganyan. napakadelikado
    • mts May 18 2011 @ 04:34pm
      Yes and to think it is an EXISTING law. How sad.
    • migster2 May 18 2011 @ 05:21pm
      agree! pag may headlights naman sila palaging naka high beam.
  • ieatworld May 18 2011 @ 12:55am
    imo, mahirap hulihin yang mga jeep at taxi na walang headlight, kase meron naman sila, pinapatay lang nila, hence, madali umabswelto kung sakali mang may batas na ganyan, although its considered a driving etiquette to turn on your headlights past 5:30pm.

    anyway, im all for this bill. its about time someone did something against abusive/undisciplined drivers. hirap satin pag may isang bill na napasa dami nag sasabing "isama nyo na rin to, unahin to, mas importante to" blah blah, hanggang wala nang natapos. isa isa lang.
  • rsa1 May 18 2011 @ 01:03am
    pag multahin na yang mga mayayabang na yan! DI rason na di makita ang daan, kung kita ng iba, bakit hindi nila kaya? Kasilaw yang mga bwiset na yan!
  • dom402 May 18 2011 @ 01:16am
    There are far more important issues concerning road safety that need to be addressed first before banning H.I.D. lamps. Like improving road illumination, filling in deep holes that are almost everywhere, removing those concrete barriers that account for many accidents. C'mon people, use your heads! Good luck with that Mr. Colmenares. You'll surely piss off a lot of people IF that bill gets passed.
  • trizfores May 18 2011 @ 02:22am
    IF the bill passes, would the police/mmda be able to tell what an aftermarket hid is comapred to a regular one? i have a feeling that they might just make huli anyone with hid. even the ones with the hid that are okay would have to defend themselves for what? money in the pockets for the people who made them huli. what else is new? :/

    will have to wait out and see what happens to the bill.
  • Lottowinner May 18 2011 @ 05:48am
    Ban 3rd party HID. Pass the Bill.

    @Users of 3rd party HID,
    1. Remove/replace your st*p*d dark windshield tint.

    2. CLEAN you headlights. Blame yourself for poor maintenance of your HL. Dont make street lights an excuse.
    • mts May 18 2011 @ 04:42pm
      I'm using dark tint, but I'm not using HID. I'm not blaming anyone and finally, it's not a st*p*d dark tint because most of the time, I'm on the road at around 12 noon. :)
    • JuanC May 19 2011 @ 02:49am
      So ibig sabihin pag madilim ung kalsada dahil un sa poorly maintained headlamps. Ang wierd..
  • GBfive May 18 2011 @ 06:16am
    no to HID... HID drivers should have their eyes checked. if they can't drive with standard lights at night on Phil. roads, they should be allowed daytime driving only.
  • rectifier May 18 2011 @ 06:43am
    crap
  • vonschnipp May 18 2011 @ 07:25am
    Finally a piece of legislation that makes sense. While they're at it, also ban dark tinted front windshields which are probably the reason why motorists install HID lamps.
  • nestortinam May 18 2011 @ 07:55am
    tama i-ban iyon. Pero maraming ibang issue na dapat una gawin. Like mga streets me ilaw ba? Iyon PUJ nagoopen ba ng Headlights hindi, kung nag open naman sila na paka taas naman ang ilaw nila.
  • ashek268 May 18 2011 @ 09:04am
    Here we go again. Grandstanding senators! All Talk No Action.
  • legacy May 18 2011 @ 10:32am
    just as GBfive said, if you need HID to drive, you have to get your eyes checked.

    ang hihina naman ng mga mata niyo kung HID pa ang kailangan niyo para makakita.

    o baka naman sobrang dark kasi ng tint niyo? in that case, utak pala ang mahina sa inyo, walang common sense. magpapa dark tint tapos hirap na hirap makakita sa gabi.
    • envyme May 19 2011 @ 02:45am
      kelangan din yon sa mga vip para hindi sila makita.
  • fdelmonte May 18 2011 @ 10:39am
    it has to start somewhere, if improving the bill is still possible, why not do it? Aftermarket HID must be banned, they emit abnormally glaring beams.
  • bananatype May 18 2011 @ 11:33am
    I've driven in rural areas of other countries where there are no streetlights and where the road condition is bad, and the locals don't use lamps brighter than halogens. So there's no difference between unlit PHL's streets and other countries', whether advanced or not.

    The only difference is that we choose to ignore safety by installing aftermarket HIDs to compensate for darkly tinted windshields!
  • Dinzo Tabamo
    Dinzo Tabamo May 18 2011 @ 11:58am
    They should also ban motorists who use high beam in the city even when the streets are lit.
  • eolsales May 18 2011 @ 12:04pm
    HID lamps should be installed and used properly. Hindi basta malagyan lang. Magkaroon naman tayo ng concern sa iba.
  • 17Sphynx17 May 18 2011 @ 12:24pm
    I agree with banning aftermarket HIDs. They really do hurt the eyes if you happen to come across one, high beam mode or not.

    As for those who say the some streets are poorly illuminated, that is true but should you then not slow down your pace a bit. The roads will certainly be dark if you are the only on the road, then you could simply turn on your high beams so you could see farther ahead. If you notice that there will be oncoming traffic, turn your high beams off.

    If that doesn't work, then you might have dirty headlights already or a very dark tint which obstructs your vision of your surroundings at night.

    It is true majority of our streets should be funded to have more lighting, but it isn't as pressing a matter as what our government needs to address as immediate. We should just drive more carefully if faced with poorly lit roads.

    And as for the concern with how the police will identify aftermarket with OEM HIDs, well I think simply adding it in the Car Registration Info should suffice as a tag with OEM HIDs as a notation that needs to be typed out.

    That should at least rid the concern of how you present the info, if questioned, if you HIDs are OEM or aftermarket, in which aftermarkets will impose fines or a ticket.

    It should more or less take about a year or two upon approval of the bill so the LTO has time to give owners, upon their renewal of vehicle registration, the updated documents of us owners having OEM HID or not.

    It also eliminates the need for newly registered vehicles for the year to go back to LTO just to have that added on or changed to their papers.

    The law should also provide a 30 day window for all owners with aftermarket HID lamps to have their refitted with the original halogen lamps.

    The law should also state that all cars before the year of introduction of OEM HID lamps are deemed illegal from having HID as it automatically and obviously places them in the catergory of aftermarket HIDs.

    Hope that was clear. =)
  • rcaballero May 18 2011 @ 01:38pm
    @Jerricson
    ok, papipikitin ko yung truck driver namin pag ikaw ang kasalubong para suruin ka ng truck..
  • ako_si_bigotilyo May 18 2011 @ 02:07pm
    sphynx, I agree with you, toggle on your high beam when you are the only person occupying the road, then switch off when there's an approaching car. That makes sense. Illegal HIDS must not be tolerated at all cause!
  • bbulusan May 18 2011 @ 02:24pm
    isama na rin siguro yung mga parating naka-High beam kahit stock HL.
  • ako_si_bigotilyo May 18 2011 @ 02:34pm
    There's still easy solution who insists on high beam, flash them or turn your high beam too, They will possibly feel they have to turn off their high beam. But of course, there are still those stubbon drivers who will ignore you even they know you were glared by there High beam.
  • 17Sphynx17 May 18 2011 @ 02:48pm
    Well you can't really make it a law as it is a driving etiquette to turn off your high beam if there is oncoming traffic headed towards you, stock or otherwise.

    If you do make it a law, it just presents itself as an undefined situational law that we as motorists would have issues with against the authorities.

    Flashing your high beam towards the vehicle/driver who does not observe driving etiquette is the only proper recourse.

    The only recourse you can really do in case he/she does not lower his/her high beam is to slow down as your vision is really greatly impaired beyond the his headlights to ensure that you are not at least caught up in a tangle once you reach the artificially created blind spot in front of you.
  • mts May 18 2011 @ 04:30pm
    pag na-ban pati ang dark tint, lalaki ang % success rate of kotong lispu. :)) Makikita na nila kung bata pa yung driver.. Sana lang, yung ibang good cops, hindi na magaya sa bad ones.. I think hindi rin 'to uusad, may gumawa na rin ng ganitong bill from some solon of Cebu, hindi ko lang matandaan yung detalye..?
  • rdjl_13 May 18 2011 @ 05:01pm
    I HOPE THIS WON'T BE PASSED! Paano nila matatanggal ang original HID??? They'll downgrade? Pathetic! That's part of the SRP of the car. Kotong lang mangyayari nyan! Let's say afttermarket lang ang huhulihin. Paano na yung may original HID? Paano pag nanghuli yung mga pulis ng may original HID?
  • hydrashok May 18 2011 @ 07:22pm
    @ rdjl_13

    Basahin mo ng maayos. Ang planong ipa-ban is the aftermarket HID which are mostly installed improperly on cars that are equipped with HL that are designed for halogen or tungsten bulbs. This causes excessive glare to incoming motorists while not providing the optimal road illumination. My Camry is equipped with OEM HID, but only for low beam, the high beam is halogen, it doesn't cause glare to incoming motorists.
    Last modified May 18 2011 @ 07:23pm
  • Rem May 18 2011 @ 07:26pm
    how will they (MMDA, police, etc.) know if a car has an orig. HID? and hindi naman po kasi pare parehas ang ilaw ng mga sasakyan, lalo na ang may mga kalumaan na. basta para sakin the best solution would be the improvement of street lights, :) btw, may mga nabibili din po na snap on projector on crystal headlamps, pwede na din po ba ipalagay ang HID dun at hindi na siya glaring? :D
  • ako_si_bigotilyo May 18 2011 @ 08:05pm
    It's pretty obvious, Aftermarket have too much glare, that improves the visibility but at the expense of an incoming motorist., while OEMs are made to be good for visibility and just nornal color temperature.
    Last modified May 18 2011 @ 08:06pm
  • rdjl_13 May 18 2011 @ 09:18pm
    @hydrashok, read Rem's comment (first line). :D Even though the difference between OEM and aftermarket HID is obvious, this will still be a way so that policemen can make "para" all vehicles that has HID and "mangotong". :D
  • 17Sphynx17 May 18 2011 @ 10:03pm
    The legislation in itself has merit as it is a safety concern with regards to use aftermarket HIDs.

    However, currently, the legislation proposed should be amended to pertain to aftermarket HIDs and not OEMs.

    The legislation should also put in place measures as to how we as consumers are not harassed in any way, shape, or form if our vehicle does have OEM and properly designed HID bulbs. (see my previous post in this comment section).

    I know the proposal I mentioned is not ironclad, but we can help make it a better law while it is still not yet passed/rejected can we not?

    But as I mentioned also in that post, I think the legislation can automatically dictate the "era" or year where vehicles model years predating year 2000 (or the exact introduction of OEM HID lamps) are automatically illegal (say a 1997 civic/corolla/lancer for example).

    It should put in place a window of opportunity upon implementation of the IRR for vehicles with aftermarket HIDs to refit them with their stock lamps/bulbs within 30 days (for those vehicles which are automatically placed under the "illegal" clause).

    However, we need the additional 2 year period, upon implementation of the said law for LTO to issue to addendum in the O.R. C.R. of your vehicle that states whether or not your vehicle comes with the OEMs. (this is simply a proposal because new vehicles bought on the implementation year of law would need 3 years before they need to reregister their vehicles.)

    Again, it's just my recommendation. I think it can be done.

    But we also need to just focus on that issue and not stray on other issues if you are to tackle that law. Just my 2 cents. =)
  • Rtyle79 May 18 2011 @ 10:26pm
    ban this only to non projector type headlamps
    • JuanC May 19 2011 @ 02:53am
      Lols. Projector o hindi it is still the same.
  • bruce May 18 2011 @ 11:22pm
    install the HID but make sure that it will be adjusted in a way that it won't affect approaching vehicle..

    i just hope di ito matuloy.. ang gawan nila ng bill is yung mga jeepneys na di gumagamit ng headlights sa gabi o siguro dahil wala talaga sila ilaw..
  • JuanC May 19 2011 @ 03:01am
    Dapat isama sa inspection sa lto and headlight metering para ma correct kung sino man ung wrongly installed headlight particularly ung mga jeeps, trucks and ung ibang car owners who doesnt care kung ok ung fixtures basta may ilaw lang. At sana every six months ang check up ng head lights. There is no need to ban HID.
  • fdelmonte May 19 2011 @ 09:20am
    rtyle79 , do your assignment, magresearch ka, parang kasi sa pagkakaalam mo basta hindi projector aftermarket na agad, which is not the case, there are cars na walang projector type headlamps pero OEM ang HID, such as Altis 2.0V.
  • warak1422 May 19 2011 @ 10:55am
    inggit ka lang Tongressman
  • warak1422 May 19 2011 @ 10:56am
    what's wrong w/ HID???
  • barry May 19 2011 @ 12:39pm
    kasama rin ba ang mga factory-installed na HID's? haler!
  • hopeless May 19 2011 @ 03:11pm
    Dapat hanggang 35 watts hid lang at hanggang 6000k-8000k lang ang max na kulay.
    Dapat kapag magrrenew ng registration ang sasakyan, kasama sa inspection kung tama ba ang buga ng low beam at high beam, halogen man o hid. Meron mga halogen lang, mostly jeepneys, pero ang low beam nila nakakasilaw na tapos mag-bbrright pa sayo. Kung tama naman sa cut off line ang low beam, hid man o hindi, aftermarket man o oem, payagan nila. Dapat magkaroon sila ng magandang gamit pang-check ng alignment at dapat sibakin nila ang corrupt! (Pag nga pala nagkasibakan ng mga corrupt, baka wala pang 5% ng total employees ng government ang matira. Baka pati pangulo tanggal. haha).
  • ChairmanPineapple May 19 2011 @ 08:54pm
    YES!!! Finally someone in our government is making sense! Yun mga abnormal na ilaw at masakit sa mata dahil sa sobrang liwanag dapat ipagbawal yan, kadalasan mayayabang pa sa kalye. Kapag nadidiliman kayo eh di huwag niyong i-tint ng sobrang dilim ang mga windshield niyo
  • ChairmanPineapple May 19 2011 @ 08:55pm
    road courtesy dapat sa kalye! Yan ang kulang sa mga maraming drivers sa lansangan
  • koneleaves May 19 2011 @ 10:36pm
    Ipagbawal din nila ung pagbenta ng HId Kits (8000K ) at pag import..
  • art May 20 2011 @ 01:13pm
    this is just a matter of correct light angles, kahit halogen kapag mali ang alignment, masakit din sa mata. look at oem HIDs, di naman masakit sa mata. it just boils down to road courtesy which many of us lack.
  • pat May 22 2011 @ 10:08pm
    This all matters on the angle of the light, just as art had said. Those of Audi and BMW don't really interfere with road safety and all of that. Aftermarket fitters of HIDs better do a good job fitting 'cause if they don't, they might be out of a job.
  • JoHunter Jun 16 2011 @ 09:59pm
    So after-market lang ang bawal? Ahahahaha :D
  • d3athmast3r Jan 31 2012 @ 12:15pm
    Kalokohan lang ito eh! Dapat at least 4300k pwede may papers na lang or receipt stating 4300k para di nakakasilaw... Takte ang hihina street lights niyo eh tapos may biglang pothole! Tsaka bago yun HID eh kung yun mga hindi kaya muna nagiilaw ang trabahuhin niyo? Dami pa rin niyan ah! Solon solon my @#$
Filter comments by:
1 to 20 of 76