Stiffer penalties for driving under influence of drugs, alcohol sought

TopGear.com.ph Philippine Car News - Solon wants stiffer penalties for driving under the influence of drugs, alcohol

Although the Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol, Dangerous Drugs and Similar Substances Act of 2011 in the House of Representative is already on its third and final reading, Rep. Marcelino Teodoro (1st District, Marikina City) apparently thinks its stipulated penalties are not enough. Teodoro has filed House Bill 5708 that seeks to "address the increasing incidence of road mishaps in the country caused by drivers while under the influence of liquor or narcotic drug."

Under the bill, an individual with a blood alcohol content of 0.10 percent or more shall be presumed under the influence of alcohol. Likewise, an individual shall be presumed under the influence of prohibited drugs if the quantity of the drug in the system is be sufficient to impair the perception, mental processes or motor function of an average individual.

"Statistics have shown that driving under the influence of intoxicating drinks and illegal drugs impairs a person's driving skills," Teodoro said.

Under the Alcohol, Dangerous Drugs and Similar Substances Act of 2011, violators may be penalized with a fine of not more than P20,000 and have their driver's license suspended for up to one month. Under Teodoro's bill, however, a person who is caught operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or prohibited drugs may be imprisoned for no more than 15 years or pay a fine of "not less than P20,000 but not more than P200,000 or both."

According to Teodoro, in the Transportation and Traffic Code, driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of liquor or a narcotic drug, "is penalized with a fine of not less than P200 nor more than P500 pesos, or imprisonment of not more than three months, or both, at the discretion of the Court."

"It is very evident that the penalties as provided in the law is inadequate and inconsequential compared to the higher risk posed by someone driving or operating a common carrier under the influence of alcohol or prohibited drugs," Teodoro added. "Road safety is everyone's concern. With the people's growing dependence on automotive technologies to cope with the demands of modern living, coupled with the growingly complex systems of roads and highways in the country, both the government and citizens should work in unison to ensure traffic regulations, both vehicular and pedestrian, are strictly implemented and observed."

COMMENTS

User account login

Not registered? Click here to be a TopGear.com.ph member.

Forgot your Password?.

Click this link to view our posting guidelines.

Filter comments by:
  • neutral Feb 06 2012 @ 08:54pm
    The bill of increasing the penalty seems good but the main problem is the implementation. Even with the current bill, the penalty might already deter most drivers to violate if they know that the law is strictly implemented by the enforcers. Also, I haven't heard of any driver under the influence of liquor/drug who was apprehended while driving and only such drunk driver will be apprehended if an accident already happened. Prevention for an accident is the key for this bill and enforcers must not accept any kinds of "lagay" or meaning to say, must be strictly implemented and no exceptions please.
  • mindkinetic Feb 06 2012 @ 11:09pm
    sanctions can only be implemented properly when equaled with rewards for instance in davao the law of non smoking in public areas has been well observed because taxi drivers can report any violators via 911 with an equivalent reward of 1000 taken from the 1500 . only 500 goes to the city's coffer. but mind me the penalty being push is to heavy and not commensurate to the violation involve. it must be considered that the punishment reccomended is far greater than one who committed felony in our country . eg. physical injuries under law requires 6months imprisonment is probationable. unless the drunken driver committed culpable violation of the constitution such as damage to properties or reckless
    imprudence resulting to homicide / physical
    injuries that such grave punishment will be justified. and this has also to pass poper litigation by a court of law to protect the rights of the accuse. and so i rest my case.
    • mindkinetic Feb 06 2012 @ 11:18pm
      erratum.... culpable violation of the constitution such as bribery or aggravating factors such as damage to propertiies or reckless imprudence resulting to homicide/ physical
      injuries....
Filter comments by:
1 to 2 of 2